It's been a site of pilgrimage over the twenty-four years since Jon Krakauer's Into the Wild first told the story of Chris McCandless, a.k.a. Alexander Supertramp -- the abandoned Fairbanks City bus, #142, in the middle of a in a clearing a couple hundred feet off the legendary Stampede Trail in Alaska, a track first blazed by a miner to his claim back in the 1930s. It even appeared on Google Earth, where it was marked "Stampede Trail Magic Bus," a name which invokes another, more mobile bus, a.k.a. "Furthur," aboard which Ken Kesey, Wavy Gravy, and others of the Merry Pranksters embarked upon trips of another kind in the 1960's.
The Fairbanks bus had been towed (along with another now gone) to the site as temporary shelter for workers years before, and had been fitted with box-spring beds and a stove; when the work was done, the bus was -- like so many things in Alaska -- abandoned. Unfortunately, its popularity was also its downfall; Alaska state troopers in Fairbanks say that more than 75 percent of their yearly rescues have been in its vicinity, and in recent years several people have drowned attempting to cross the Teklanika River, which cuts across the route to the bus, including a woman who had just visited the bus with her newly wed husband. Finally, on June 18th 2020, the bus was airlifted off the the site by an Alaska National Guard helicopter to an undisclosed location. Currently, it's undergoing conservation on the campus of U. Alaska Fairbanks, and will eventually be on display at the Museum of the North in Fairbanks.
The Fairbanks bus had been towed (along with another now gone) to the site as temporary shelter for workers years before, and had been fitted with box-spring beds and a stove; when the work was done, the bus was -- like so many things in Alaska -- abandoned. Unfortunately, its popularity was also its downfall; Alaska state troopers in Fairbanks say that more than 75 percent of their yearly rescues have been in its vicinity, and in recent years several people have drowned attempting to cross the Teklanika River, which cuts across the route to the bus, including a woman who had just visited the bus with her newly wed husband. Finally, on June 18th 2020, the bus was airlifted off the the site by an Alaska National Guard helicopter to an undisclosed location. Currently, it's undergoing conservation on the campus of U. Alaska Fairbanks, and will eventually be on display at the Museum of the North in Fairbanks.
When McCandless's body was found there by moose hunters in September of 1992, his family had not known his whereabouts or even heard from him, for more than two years. A young man full of promise, an A-student with a degree from a top college, no student loans, and a $25,000 start up savings from his parents, he seemed like a young man who had it made. And yet, before he departed on his curious quest, he'd given all that money to charity, burned the cash in his wallet and (soon after) abandoned his car. Changing his name to Alexander Supertramp, he traveled by hitch-hiking, crashing on couches, and working -- apparently hard and well -- at a series of farm jobs. He made friends everywhere he went, and yet at the end, he didn't want anyone to go with him. Krakauer, a journalist for Outside Magazine, was hired to do a story, which he did (it appeared in 1993), but he was still unsatisfied. Tracking down more of McCandless's friends -- some of whom contacted him after seeing the article in the magazine, helped fill out the picture, while Alex's few leavings -- postcards to friends, notes scribbled in the margins of books, and such -- offered the bare outlines of a journey.
Into the Wild, the resulting book, was a huge bestseller, and in 2007 was adapted as a film by Sean Penn. And yet, despite the book's immense popularity, readers have remained divided: for some, McCandless is a true hero, a voyager of the spirit whose restless trek symbolizes everything great about the human desire to explore the world -- while for others, including quite a few Alaskans, he's just one of the apparently endless stream of inexperienced, foolish, and just plain stupid people who head out into the wilderness without the knowledge, skills, or materials essential to surviving. The debate is not an entirely new one; as Krakauer observes, a similar argument has long raged over Arctic expeditions such as that of Sir John Franklin, which -- though sanctioned by the British Empire and provided with what was though the best equipment -- canned food, two enormous ships, flour, buscuit, and rum -- proved unable to survive in the harsh Arctic climate, even though, a few miles from the stranded ice-bound vessels, Inuit families were enjoying a rich meal of seal meat and muktuk, and bouncing healthy babies on their knees in their snug igloos.
So, as we begin our journey with Chris/Alex, what do we think? Try not to be polarized by the debate which pits McCandless as hero vs. idiot -- but give a read to this thoughtful essay by my friend, the Alaskan Journalist David James. Would you, if you could have, gone to visit the bus? What was it that drew so many to the place? And what now, that the bus is taken away -- what should be done with it? Don't hesitate to speak your mind -- Chris certainly didn't.
So, as we begin our journey with Chris/Alex, what do we think? Try not to be polarized by the debate which pits McCandless as hero vs. idiot -- but give a read to this thoughtful essay by my friend, the Alaskan Journalist David James. Would you, if you could have, gone to visit the bus? What was it that drew so many to the place? And what now, that the bus is taken away -- what should be done with it? Don't hesitate to speak your mind -- Chris certainly didn't.
UPDATE: Here's a link to a documentary about Chris that includes interviews with his family members; you can also watch an older documentary from 2007 that retraces Chris's route. If you're interested in the current conservation status of Bus 142, here's the latest update.

Madison Kite
ReplyDeleteAssignment #1: Chapters 1-10
I find it interesting that McCandless is so hell-bent on going on an adventure but repeatedly needs others to save him from his mistakes. McCandless wants to escape humanity but is lost without civilization guiding him. While I see his point of breaking away from materialism and seeking deeper meaning in life, I find his ideologies hypocritical. Here are some examples I have noticed so far; let me know if I am missing any!:
Jim Gallien drove Chris/Alex to Stampede Trail.
Chris/Alex wrote a note begging for the help of others in his last moments.
Wayne Westerberg, whom Chris/Alex met at a bar, offered him a job so he could live.
Crazy Ernie offered Chris/Alex a ride and a job (granted, Ernie never paid him).
Jan Burres gave Chris/Alex housing and food for a week.
Ron Franz gave Chris/Alex multiple rides and taught him everything he knew about leatherworking. He later gave Chris/Alex supplies for this Alaskan expedition, like a fishing pole and an Arctic parka.
Gail Borah (Westerberg’s on-and-off girlfriend) had Chris/Alex over for supper multiple times.
Controversially, I believe McCandless’ ideologies parallel Ted Kaczynski (aka the Unabomber) in some ways. Both McCandless and Kaczynski seemed to despise materialism and late-stage capitalism. And both escaped to the woods to escape civilization. But I would like the highlight that Kaczynski also murdered three people and harmed others, while McCandless was completely innocent. I also believe that Kaczynski was more prepared for living off of the land while McCandless was less prepared and was lost in the stardom of independence.
Madison,
DeleteI can see why you would say he is hypocritical in his beliefs and still needing society. But I would ask, was it people he wanted to get away from or the materialism/extravagant lifestyles that he saw all around him?
Although, I will admit, looking at your examples in a list like that definitely make Chris/Alex appear to be a mooch or a bum in every sense, and borderline hypocritical (when he was so adamant about not taking gifts before he departed on his journey). As a naive young adult (even though he was very well educated) he had no idea what he was doing when it came to survival. Intelligence does not equate to survival skills, as he obviously proved throughout his journey.
That's a good point. I think it is a little bit of both. I think he wants to find himself in solitude but consistently needs help from others. I also think that he might view people as materialistic and therefore wants to separate from both society and people. I don't know if what I said makes any sense!
DeleteMadison Kite
I see what you mean with the hypocrisies, but I am not sure about the connection with Kaczynski, the unabomber as both of them seem so different. It is true that both of them were fed up with the constraints of society, but how do you relate that to hypocrisy?
DeleteI agree with Alex, I think the connection doesn't really form here. Chris was a person who went out of his way to do good deeds to others (if you look deeper into what his life was like). In this case, like Chris stated I think it was more of him not having any clue about what it entailed to do what he wanted to do. Its easy to think we can do certain things, but the reality that hits you when you set on the path to those things might be different than what you imagined. And I think more than him wanting to "mooch" off of people, he just found himself needing the help, and had no choice but to take it (there was also a lot that he rejected). And as for he note left in his final days.. he didn't go out there on a suicide mission, so its easy to say that any one of us (no matter how proud or stubborn) would run to ask for help if we knew for certain that we were knocking on the doors of death.
Delete-V
I find it interesting that someone from with such a promising future would have chosen to leave everything behind and take on a lifestyle so much cut off from everything in present day life that makes survivability a notion that rests in the background.
ReplyDeleteWith Chris/Alex choosing to live as a minimalist and be satisfied with his belongings even prior to taking on his quest into the unknown, that in itself is not what is surprising. Being as intelligent and educated he was, how could he possibly think that he had the skill set to overcome anything that could be thrown at him? He was not from and outdoors type of family that would have provided him with basic survival skills (nor did he take the time to learn them before embarking on his journey).
On the other hand, I can see why the longing for freedom from our materialistic and capitalistic society is a dream for many. Many have come to be greedy and always wanting more and more in our current day society and the appealing aspect of nomadism and living minimally does have its weight. Especially having traveled to other countries and seeing how much people today take for granted it is not astonishing to understand the point of view that Chris/Alex had to not want to be another pawn in society.
You have made some excellent points, Chris. I do have a thought about why despite his apparent intelligence, Chris lacked common sense. I think this is true for some people with high intelligence. Some people can be extremely brilliant in either math or writing, but be the most unorganized individuals you will ever meet. That being said, I think Chris's high intelligence may have been connected to his lack of reasoning. That was one of my thoughts while I was reading the book.
DeleteAs I was reading the book, I was intrigued by Chris's story. My first impression while I was reading it was that Chris or Alex was an irresponsible and selfish young guy and, at the same time, a very courageous and enthusiastic person. I also found it interesting how each character generally describes him as intelligent and hard worker. As I was reading, I was wondering why someone at his age who was good at college, who came from an upper-middle-class family, wanted to escape from his family and even spent two years without communicating with them had a big desire to live in Alaska.
ReplyDeleteHis rejection of materialism and desire for a more authentic existence struck a chord with me. Thanks to the documentary about Chris, I learned more about Chris's childhood and his family; all the questions and assumptions that I had were answered in that video. Unfortunately, Chris came from a violent family; as a child, he and his sister witnessed their parent's fights, which affected both of them, especially Chris. This is why Chris had a big desire to escape from his family; I do not think he went through that adventure to die; he did it live and to pursue his happiness and emotional freedom.
-Yeison De La Rosa
That is so true, Madison. Chris was definitely a rebel who seemed like a narcissist, but he had a very caring heart. I think you are definitely correct that his family situation might have played a role in his desire to escape. He just wanted to be by himself so he could recollect his thoughts, and discover who he was.
DeleteWhat is the relationship between exploration and risk?
ReplyDeleteBy Alex Logan
Exploration always comes with risks. It is risky every time we venture out into the unknown, especially when we fail to take the proper precautions or heed the advice of others like Chris McCandless did. By choosing to trek out into the wild away from civilization, Chris put his life at risk because he was exposed to the elements, he lacked experience with hunting, and he was isolated from civilization. Any journey that we embark on involves risks, whether they are life-threatening like in the case of Chris McCandless or risks that involve morality. For instance, someone could sneak on an airplane without a ticket, which is a federal crime just to experience an adventure of flying for the first time with the knowledge that they could get caught. This individual is exploring by ascending the plane, knowing that they run the risk of being arrested for committing a crime. Chris had been warned by many individuals of the dangers involved with embarking on such a journey, but he ignored everybody’s warnings and advice which unfortunately led to his untimely demise.
The bottom line is that everything we explore in life comes with risks, even if those risks are not life-threatening like Chris’s were. Going to college can be risky. Students may be tempted by things that may not be good for them, like alcohol or hazing that might occur in fraternities or sororities. Getting an education is risky simply because students may plug themselves into a load of classes that might be over their heads and realize that they cannot do them which may cause them to lose their motivation and fail. College is a time for exploration, but exploration does not come without risks. Risks are a part of life that enable us to make the decision whether our journey is worthwhile. It is important to take stock and listen to those risk factors so we can decide if we want to persevere through our journey or turn back and take an alternate route.
I agree Alex,
DeleteExploration does come with risks no matter what you’re trying to explore, be it college like you’ve stated, or visiting new places, trying new foods etc. There’s always some form of risk and sometimes you could be fully prepared for your journey and yet fall into trouble.
Jaycee
Just a note that the Link to "older documentary 2007" seems to no longer be available
ReplyDeleteI think that more than trying to answer the question of whether this journey makes McCandless a hero or an Idiot --as stated on some articles I came across-- It is a better question to ask why? (Like Chris did above). While reading through the book it is almost impossible to not wonder where the people in the story are today. The deeper one looks into his journey, into his life, and at the impression he left on all of those he came across, the easier it is to see that more than him being a narcissist or a rebel or a hypocrite, he was someone who was lost (yes, stubborn, but lost). I think he set himself on this journey to run away from the truths that were hidden inside the walls of this home, and to find the person that he thought he wanted to be based on what he had read on the books he was so fixated on. He had an idea of what life what supposed to be or look like (based on those books) and he wanted to find that for himself.
ReplyDeleteI 100% agree that he was not ready. He completely underestimated the demands of the land. He had been out on his own before on other outdoor journeys, but nothing close to what Alaska would bring. On a letter written by his sister, she mentions that they spent a lot of time camping and hiking with their parents when they were young, and that Chris was always consumed by the adventures he could find out there. She mentioned that he believed that having a plan defeated the purpose of having an adventure. I think his way of thinking was influenced a lot by the books he read, and his desire to run away from the prison that was his home, and the terrible humans that he considered his parents to be. I think his hesitance to accept help, comes from the feeling that this was his own self discovery journey and he needed to do this by himself. I think throughout the journey he learns and realized that he does in fact need help from others, but he is very particular on the kind of help he accepts and declines. On interviews I found of those who me Chris and gave him shelter, they describe him as the hardest worker they've ever met. From this I can appreciate that he was not out there just accepting handouts to make up for his mistake of being ill prepared, but he was willing to work (and work hard) for the help that he needed.
This is definitely an interesting story. I look forward to reading more, and finding out more about Chris' life and his journey, and that of those who came across him.
^^ Veronica L.
DeleteForgot to add my name above.
Sometimes it seems, and probably is true, that going to exotic places near and far is easily accessible to the rich and those that have less, tend to take more risks when exploring new places. As Alex had pointed out in his letter to Ron, he wanted the old man to go out forget his worldly possessions and see the world and he insisted that the experience is very different. He stated, “you must do it economy style, no motels, do your own cooking, as a general rule spend as little as possible and you will enjoy it much more immensely”. I agree with Alex here. Going to a beautiful place, let’s say the Grand Canyon by helicopter, staying at a hotel and viewing it from the sky is a very different experience than say hiking there, spending the night out there under the sky and exploring it on foot, and feeling the earth with your own hands and feet. I believe you will enjoy it more! However, it will be at a much greater risk, and you will have to decide for yourself if you are at peace with the fact that something could go wrong. So far, my impression of Chris is that he was deeply troubled by anger towards his parents and the fake image that they put out pretending that there were no skeletons in their closet. It made Chris want to escape everything, reinvent himself as Alex the adventurer who wasn’t afraid to follow his heart’s desire even if it went against what his parent believed to be right. This pain and anger at his parents made him take greater risks for his travels that pushed the boundary of insanity.
ReplyDeleteJaycee Johnson
If Chris McCandless had survived his journey “into the wild,” I think it would have been equally as meaningful. It would be a huge accomplishment. It shows hard work and a lot of dedication to having learned the necessary survival skills needed to live off the grid. Westerberg mentions that “He was the hardest worker I’ve ever seen. Didn’t matter what it was, he’d do it.” Today we would be reading such a different story of his journey. Rather than being thought of as a sad, idealistic young man with a tragic story. I truly believe that if he survived, he could have been an inspiration to a lot of younger people with a similar home life or for those whose need to find purpose and dig deeper to get to know themselves. Through most of our adolescent years we are taught to live up to certain standards and expectations, whether from our parents/family or the environment in which we live. Chris could have helped by creating a safe place for lost or runaway kids and taught them the ways of living off the land without money and materialistic items. A little off topic, but I wonder why he chose Alaska aside from being far away as possible from his family. He could have faced nature in other states like Oregon or New Hampshire.
ReplyDeleteBy Mariah Dale
I think it was because of the books he read. They focused more on those regions
DeleteMariana Morales
ReplyDeleteWhen reading Chris's journey into the Alaskan wilderness it does show an example of how the relationship between exploration and risk can go hand in hand. His adventure of going into the unknown because of his desire for freedom and self-discovery was really risky. Traveling into unfamiliar territory without the right preparation/resources exposed him to dangers like starvation and exposure to bad weather. He shows that exploration often involves taking risks because there is that uncertainty and possibly facing unforeseen challenges/dangers. Sometimes we feel the need to push boundaries of what is known and comfortable when we are in search of new experiences, knowledge, or personal growth.
He was going into this journey stubbornly like I get that he wanted to vanish but he shouldn't have burned his money because he was going to need it eventually I mean even if you want to see how long you can go without it you can still keep it just in case something happens and you need it for food or like when he died they could not even identify him properly and having his wallet would've made that easier and if he wanted to vanish he would've done that rather than leaning on to the people who helped him because he was lacking the things he was being stubborn about in the beginning but I guess in the end it is good that he did because then they wouldn't have put together his story with the interviews. Also, there was no need to change his name to Alex in my opinion like I get that was his way of turning over a leaf when he was doing his adventure of freedom but it just made it a little harder when his family was worried and had someone trying to look for him. He was lucky that they at least found his body, unlike the other guy who was still missing. I can't believe there are other people who did the same thing as Chris that is so scary to me I could never at least not in the way that they did.
What is the relationship between exploration and risk?
ReplyDeleteWhy do some people find joy in jumping out of airplanes and paragliding and some people simply find joy in small excretions; like going on a cruise? Risk is part of the enjoyment for some, fear hungry and excitement driven, people looking for some entertainment within their lives. Chris to me is someone that hated the normal way of life and yearned for some risk or excitement to plague his life with to feel free. As many have said before, exploration does come with risk, but the amount of risk leads people to draw the line in the sand between exhilaration and plain stupid.
In my eyes, Chris was one of those people that loved to land in the middle. As it stated in the book, Chris had survived close to death situations before where he lived on nothing, he loved the achievement of feeling like he conquered the land with the least amount of resources possible. That’s why he went to do the same in Alaska. He wanted that feeling of conquering a terrain and living to tell the tale in postcards to his friends. He was looking for self-accomplishment and self-satisfaction.
Saying that Chris didn’t have signs and chances to stop him from doing the last adventure that he will ever do is not true at all, but reading through the book you get the sense of how important this Alaska trip was to him so nothing was going to deter him from seeing it through.
Chris’ journey inherently involved risk taking constantly and an insane amount of luck, but the adventure at him and the journey to Chris’ own self-discovery in finding who he is as a person and seeing the world for the beauty it truly has underneath all the political and socioeconomic conditions that it boars on the surface.
Chris went underprepared to an execration that required more preparation but to him that was the fun in it. The risk that came with the exploration was the gain and the fun part. For instance, one page in the book when I believe Chris was about to leave Wayne to go to Alaska; Wayne offered to buy Chris a plane ticket to Alaska for Chris to work a little longer and will get to Alaska quicker, but Chris declined. He said that would be “cheating”. Chris wanted the risk, the adventure, the highs and lowers of exploring and finding himself. He wanted the pain, because when he comes out at the end, he thought it will be all worth it. Too bad his journey was cut short, and his luck had run cold.
Had Chris McCandless survived his journey, the significance of his odyssey might have been perceived differently. Surviving the wilderness would likely have transformed his idealistic escapade into a completed narrative of personal triumph and enlightenment, perhaps reinforcing his belief in the necessity of such extreme measures to attain true freedom and self-knowledge. His survival could have allowed him to articulate his insights and experiences, possibly inspiring others to reflect on their lives and the societal constructs they navigate. However, McCandless's untimely death imparts a poignant, tragic layer to his story, underlining the perils of his idealism and the harsh realities of nature. This fatal outcome amplifies the cautionary aspects of his tale, serving as a somber reminder of the fine line between transcendental aspirations and mortal vulnerability. Consequently, while survival might have added a triumphant dimension to McCandless’s journey, it is his demise that profoundly encapsulates the profound risks entailed in seeking an unadulterated existence.
ReplyDeleteBy Tariq Adio
After doing some reading and looking at the discussion questions there was one question that stood out to me. Question five asked about the relationship between exploration and risk, now I feel that there is a fine line between the both but if we are looking at this from the perspective of Chris/Alex I wanna say the risk factor is higher in this scenario. I say that because Chris/Alex was more book smart than street smart. I can understand the point of trying to get away from the “normal” way of life and pushing for that sort of exploration but when you don’t have those basics sort of skill sets to survive in the wild and understand how to live off the land, your chances of survival just skyrockets to a rate where your almost guarantee to not survive.
ReplyDeleteAlthough Chris/Alex had survived near death situations prior to this trip to Alaska, it almost gave that trip just that more meaning, and throughout reading you can see how he looked forward to that risk and didn't want an easy way out like a plane ticket. He looked forward to the challenge and risk that would come before him as he made his journey to Alaska. Now looking back at it i feel almost the question of “would he actually survive” if he took the easy way out of things and didn't push himself to overcome some extreme opticals? I wanna say yes, because like i said earlier he had more book smarts than street smarts. Knowing his true limits ultimately could have saved him from death and just made that risk factor a little bit lower knowing his limits.
Personally, I’m unsure that Chris had planned on surviving this journey at all. Before setting off Chris cries while saying goodbye to some of his friends, something that even struck them as odd. The way he left and how unprepared he was for the trip combined with the letters he wrote saying this would be the “last anyone sees of him” leads me to believe that Chris had planned on dying out in the wilderness, maybe not as soon as he did but eventually. However, before he finally starved to death changed his mind and decided he wanted to live, hence the note asking for rescue.
ReplyDeleteIf Chris McCandless had survived his trip into the Alaskan wilderness, I don’t think we would be hearing about his journey at all. The way I see it he would have either quietly figured out a way to live in the wild for yours to come which is highly unlikely or been rescued and nursed back to health beside the people he met during his journey. Following his recovery here I believe Chris would have ventured back out on another journey too dangerous for him, or return to society and lose his marbles.
jonathan lozinski
ReplyDeleteMaddie Brodeur
If Christ McCandless survived his journey "into the wild," it would be challenging but also would have
been equally meaningful to survive. If he survived, Chris also known as Alex, would have continued to live a great life of adventure and self discovery. He also could have returned to society with a different perspective from the experiences he has gained from being in the wild. If he had survived, he might have gained insights into himself and could have reinforced his beliefs about the simple things in life. Chris could have prompted others to approach the same journey but with more caution and preparation. I feel that if Chris didn't do things the hard way and that he took it more serious and prepared, he would have survived. His death was a tragedy, but reflected the balance between personal freedom and his responsibility as well as expectations on individual choices. I believe that he wasn't planning on surviving because he said goodbye to his friends and the way he just up and left. Also journaling everything he has done with pictures and notes definitely didn't seem like he wanted to survive.
Samantha Ames
ReplyDeleteFirst learning about Chris, I perceived him as someone so angry at the world that he didn’t know what to do with himself other than run away from it, while leaving his $24,000 to a humanitarian organization that fights hunger, homelessness, and injustice. Learning the charity that he donated his savings shows how purposeful this journey was to him. As the chapters went on, I still believed that he did not know what to do other than run away from his problems. However, I felt there was more to it, such as Chris wanted to prove to himself what he was capable of. Self-exploration and world exploration happen simultaneously for Chris in these first 10 chapters. Exploring the undiscovered world (the world according to Chris) was a result of Chris’s self-exploration. It would, of course, be more interesting to know the story from Chris’s point of view rather than that of Jon Krakauer’s. For now, we are relying on Krakauer to tell his story.
Absolutely yes! I would love to visit the bus and experience the legendary Stampede Trail in Alaska that Chris Mccandles had took. Unlike McCandless, I would have prepared for what I would be faced with and would try to get there and back home via the safest and fastest route possible. Personally, I find McCandless’s personality and mindset to be interesting. Being such an intelligent human being with strong hard-working qualities but lacks the ability to overlook the simplest questions. I think what drew many people about the place was the location, since its abandonment was in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness. Also, while scrolling through many pictures and YouTube videos on the internet, the bus sits peacefully in the open area. In all fairness, the Fairbank bus #142 should be on display at a museum or somewhere at a safe environment.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the relationship between exploration and risk?
The relationship between exploration and risk goes hand in hand. When exploring, there is always a chance that an exploration will not go as planned and leads to risk. However, without taking risks, there would not be any discovery or expedition. Which is why it is important to find the perfect balance. So, being careful when arranging a journey and planning for any caution to arise.
1-Into the wild
ReplyDeleteReading the article by David James, I was intrigued by the idea that Krakauer’s attempt to idolize McCandles journey as that of a hero was self-serving and dangerous. Writing the story as he did could glorify McCandles and exonerate him of his poor decision and ill-preparation to the point of endangering others to repeat his mistakes and lose their lives as well. I think there is certainly a desire to paint Chris/Alex as a heroic figure, if for no other reason than to give some reason for the tragic death of a young man who seemed to be very thoughtful and amiable and left a positive impression on the many people he met along his journey. However, it is important to acknowledge that “deifying” Chris/Alex into a heroic figure can cause hurt others and lead them towards their demise, which seems to motivate the vitriol towards Krakauer in the article. To me Chris/Alex’s story comes across more like a tragedy than that of a hero’s journey, especially old Greek tragedies which often result in the hero’s downfall as a result of their flaws. In these stories, the protagonists often have noble or respectable traits, but are ultimately undone by a fatal flaw which causes their demise or undoing. These stories are often cautionary tales that still portray their heroes in a noble way, but also don’t pull their punches when showcasing the flaws of their characters and often have more intricate and complex characters as a result. I think it is appropriate for Chris/Alex in this respect, as while he did have a number of redeeming traits (hardworking, adventurous, and resilient in many ways), his recklessness and thrill-seeking behavior led to his demise (and the demise of some of those who would follow in his footsteps.) It should be noted that such a story is no less impactful or profound, but also does more justice to the reality of the situation without the need to revise the events to fit a narrative, like Krakauer’s unwillingness to acknowledge starvation as the most likely cause of death. In the end, I feel as though his idealist attitude which led him to live as "a dreamer" and seek adventure lent him the courage to do so, but also kept him blinded to the harsh reality of surviving harsh conditions, which led to an early and tragic demise.
If the bus still remained, I would like to imagine myself making the pilgrimage to visit it, although the danger of the trip does diminish my interest in it. I hope that those who feel inspired by McCandles find ways to fulfil their senses of adventure and divorce from materialist society with greater success than Chris did and live to tell the tale.
K'lynn Pena,
DeleteI agree with your point that this story resembles more of a story of a tragic hero because there are a lot of connecting themes to that plot. Throughout the story, the narrator makes a point of adding quotes from interviewed people that imply traits to Chris such as hard-working, intelligent well-mannered, etc. That helps the reader to envision Chris as admirable or likable. But there were many times and situations I felt frustrated with Chris because of some of the decisions that he made that were generally not beneficial to himself or the situation he was in and seemed more prideful rather than logical. Perhaps because I know the ending is his demise it makes me question some of his decisions more but also in hindsight, I felt there were so many opportunities where he put his ideologies ahead of logic. I understand that he was educated, and it is mentioned throughout many of the chapters, but I felt he lacked some common sense or seemed immature at times. I do grasp that he felt compelled to comply with "civil disobedience" for instance burning money or not taking it but many times falling to the same endpoint...having to work to either buy food or supplies seemed senseless. Also, I can see your point on the narrator idealizing his story. I felt Krakauer was biased. He portrays McCandless's story as that of someone who happens upon hard times but triumphs through the use of attributes but is a story of a naive boy who is chasing something. From my perspective, Chris hasn't come to terms with why the way is he is/ how he feels. (having to do with his family/parents). Many of the characters interviewed discussed how they understood Alex's difficulties with his family and never pressed on the issue because of the feelings it would invoke. This seems like an underlying theme for why he may disobey societal norms or purposely run from attachments. He is lucky to have met such generous and kind people. One thing that sparks my curiosity is why Chris felt that surviving needed to be done with as little to nothing as possible. I would think to get the full experience of surviving and being the best hunter or gatherer there are certain necessities required in order to achieve that. (An axe or better weapon for hunting for example)
Is self-exploration as important as exploring undiscovered parts of the world?
ReplyDeleteSelf-exploration and exploring the world are both important in their own unique ways. Self-exploration involves understanding your thoughts, feelings, and beliefs to understand yourself. I believe this is crucial for growth and self-awareness. On the other hand, travelling the world gives us the chance to encounter new things, widen our perspectives and learn about other cultures.
This can bring awareness and personal development. self-exploration and the outside world are both worthwhile pursuits that enhance a fulfilling experience and a dynamic change in perspective. Though these paths help build character, they often can lead to many difficulties. Self-exploration may cause us to take chances on ourselves and push us to moral dilemmas or actions unfamiliar that can cause us to fail. Similarly, adventuring can also have its dangers, both financially and physically. It’s only when we can accept the possibility of discomfort that we can grow as people and find ourselves in the end.
By Luis Perez
If Chris McCandless had survived his journey “into the wild,” do you think it
ReplyDeletewould have been equally meaningful?
I believe that if Chris McCandless had survived his journey, it would have been as equally meaningful. If he had been alive today, he could have shared his experiences and hardships with others who also believed that living a cookie cutter lifestyle wasn't the only path that leads to a fulfilling life. He likely would have encouraged others like he did in his letter to Ronald Franz to "boldly do things which you may have previously never have thought of doing, or been too hesitant to attempt". Chris inspired Franz to go out and try new experiences, to not settle down, and to find the full meaning of life and its beauty. Franz left his old life, put away his belongings in a storage locker, and bought a CMC Duravan to go on his own adventure. Had Chris returned from Alaska, he could have continued to spread inspiration, guide others seeking change, and in the end show that his pilgrimage was not just about escaping society but about embracing a more deeper, authentic way of living.
Madison Kite
ReplyDeleteAssignment #3: Comparing Krakauer and McCandless
In chapters 14-15, I finally understood why Krakauer put so much time and effort into retelling McCandless’ story; Jon Krakauer sees himself in Chris McCandless. Both Krakauer and McCandless grapple with the sudden impulses for adventure and risk-taking. Both “suffer” from extreme wanderlust and transcendence. One of the major differences between the two is that Krakauer didn’t seem to have a death wish. Krakauer wanted to take extreme risks, but throughout his whole trip, he ensured he had enough supplies and that a helicopter would deliver more goods while climbing “The Devil's Thumb.” On the other hand, McCandless was more impulsive and tried to make situations worse for himself (e.g., burning his money and not bringing enough supplies). Krakauer idolizes McCandless and his decisions while revealing all his mistakes and what led to his death.
As I read David James' essay, I couldn't help but think about the different perspectives that people have on Chris's journey. Some see him as a hero, a true adventurer who was driven by a desire to explore and experience the world on his own terms. Others view him as reckless and foolish, a young man who lacked the knowledge and skills to survive in the wilderness. I think what drew so many people to the bus was its sense of mystery and allure. It was a place where people could come to imagine themselves in Chris's shoes, to dream of leaving their own lives behind and embarking on a journey of self-discovery. And for some, the bus was a symbol of freedom and adventure, a reminder that there is still so much beauty and wonder in the world.
ReplyDeleteSide Note: I think it would be a great idea to put the bus on display at the Museum of the North in Fairbanks. This will allow people to continue to learn about Chris's story and to appreciate the beauty and significance of the bus. It will also serve as a reminder of the importance of respecting the wilderness and the risks that come with exploring it. Chris's story its a reminder that there is still so much beauty and wonder in the world, and that sometimes it's necessary to take risks and push ourselves outside of our comfort zones in order to grow and discover new things.
Amanda Tentoco
ReplyDeleteWhen reading about Chris's journey, it shows the great relationship between exploration and risk. With his desire for freedom and self discovery he goes out on adventure. With going on his adventure there are also risk factors as well. When traveling to an unknown place you have no one around to call for help or you will run out of resources. he shows that going on adventure and explorations open up risks to yourself. there is always an uncertainty of survival when going into new places without the right resources.